Loading...
Agentic AI Attacks
Multi-agent security testing and autonomous system exploitation techniques
Available Techniques
Multi-Agent Orchestration Attack
(MAOA)Exploitation of communication vulnerabilities between multiple AI agents in an orchestrated system, manipulating inter-agent messaging to achieve unauthorized objectives.
Key Features
- •Inter-agent message injection
- •Orchestration layer manipulation
- •Agent coordination disruption
Primary Defenses
- •Message signing and verification
- •Agent authentication protocols
- •Communication encryption
Key Risks
Agent Goal Manipulation
(AGM)Manipulation of an autonomous agent's objectives or goals through prompt injection, context manipulation, or system prompt override, causing the agent to pursue attacker-controlled objectives.
Key Features
- •Objective redefinition
- •Goal drift induction
- •Priority manipulation
Primary Defenses
- •Immutable goal specifications
- •Goal validation checkpoints
- •System prompt protection
Key Risks
Agent Permission Escalation
(APE)Exploitation of permission and access control vulnerabilities in agentic systems to grant an agent unauthorized capabilities or access to restricted resources.
Key Features
- •Role boundary violation
- •Capability expansion attacks
- •Permission inheritance exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Principle of least privilege
- •Explicit permission grants per action
- •Permission validation at execution time
Key Risks
Multi-Agent Collusion Attack
(MACA)Coordinating multiple agents to work together maliciously, bypassing individual agent restrictions through distributed, collaborative exploitation.
Key Features
- •Distributed task splitting
- •Information sharing between compromised agents
- •Collective policy bypass
Primary Defenses
- •Agent isolation and sandboxing
- •Information flow controls
- •Behavioral correlation analysis
Key Risks
Confused Deputy Attack
(CDA)Tricking a privileged agent into performing unauthorized actions on behalf of an attacker by exploiting the agent's trust in its inputs or tools.
Key Features
- •Privilege abuse through trusted paths
- •Tool invocation manipulation
- •Authority exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Explicit authorization for tool use
- •Request origin validation
- •Action authorization verification
Key Risks
Tool Integration Exploitation
(TIE)Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the integration between AI agents and external tools, functions, or APIs, leading to unauthorized tool usage or malicious function calls.
Key Features
- •Function calling manipulation
- •Tool parameter injection
- •API endpoint exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Strict parameter validation
- •Function call authorization
- •Tool capability restrictions
Key Risks
Agent Action Untraceability
(AAU)Techniques to make agent actions difficult or impossible to trace, audit, or attribute, enabling covert malicious activities within agentic systems.
Key Features
- •Log suppression
- •Action obfuscation
- •Attribution confusion
Primary Defenses
- •Immutable audit logs
- •Comprehensive action logging
- •Log integrity verification
Key Risks
Recursive Agent Subversion
(RAS)Self-propagating exploitation where a compromised agent subverts other agents it interacts with, creating a chain of compromised agents throughout the system.
Key Features
- •Agent-to-agent infection
- •Payload propagation
- •Cascading compromise
Primary Defenses
- •Agent sandboxing and isolation
- •Communication sanitization
- •Behavioral anomaly detection
Key Risks
Excessive Agency Exploitation
(EAE)Exploitation of agents that have been granted excessive permissions, capabilities, or autonomy beyond what is necessary for their intended function.
Key Features
- •Over-permission abuse
- •Scope creep exploitation
- •Capability misuse
Primary Defenses
- •Strict permission minimization
- •Role-based capability constraints
- •Regular permission audits
Key Risks
Agent Feedback Loop Poisoning
(AFLP)Manipulation of learning or improvement feedback loops in agents to gradually corrupt their behavior, decision-making, or learned patterns over time.
Key Features
- •Gradual behavior corruption
- •Feedback manipulation
- •Learning process poisoning
Primary Defenses
- •Feedback validation and filtering
- •Learning rate limits
- •Behavior drift detection
Key Risks
Data Exfiltration Testing
(DET)Testing agents' ability to prevent unauthorized data access and exfiltration across session boundaries, user contexts, and application scopes through isolation control validation.
Key Features
- •Cross-session data isolation testing
- •Cross-customer data boundary validation
- •Cross-application data leakage testing
Primary Defenses
- •Strong session-level data isolation
- •Customer-specific data boundaries
- •Application context segregation
Key Risks
Goal Extraction Attempt Testing
(GEAT)Testing agent resilience against adversarial attempts to extract internal goals, objectives, or instructions through probing, escalation tactics, or dialog manipulation.
Key Features
- •Goal disclosure resistance testing
- •System prompt extraction prevention
- •Objective inference resistance
Primary Defenses
- •System prompt isolation and protection
- •Goal disclosure filters
- •Instruction redaction mechanisms
Key Risks
Hallucination Chain Exploitation
(HCE)Exploiting cascading hallucinations across multiple agents in a chain, where false information from one agent propagates and amplifies through subsequent agents, compounding misinformation.
Key Features
- •Cascading false outputs
- •Multi-step hallucination propagation
- •Compounding misinformation
Primary Defenses
- •Multi-source verification requirements
- •Hallucination detection at each step
- •Fact-checking integration
Key Risks
Orchestrator Poisoning Attack
(OPA)Targeting the master orchestrator or coordination layer that manages multiple agents, compromising the central decision-making and task distribution system to control all subordinate agents.
Key Features
- •Master agent compromise
- •Coordination layer manipulation
- •Task distribution control
Primary Defenses
- •Orchestrator hardening and isolation
- •Master agent authentication
- •Coordination validation
Key Risks
Orchestrator State Poisoning via Agent Responses
(OSPAR)Testing orchestrator resilience to having its internal memory, context, or planning capabilities corrupted by malicious or manipulated responses from the agents it manages, causing degraded decision-making across the system.
Key Features
- •Agent response manipulation
- •Orchestrator context corruption
- •Planning capability poisoning
Primary Defenses
- •Agent response validation and sanitization
- •State integrity verification
- •Context corruption detection
Key Risks
Data Exfiltration via Goal Inference
(DEGI)Manipulating an agent's goal inference mechanisms to extract sensitive data by framing data access as necessary to achieve legitimate-seeming objectives.
Key Features
- •Goal-justified data access
- •Objective manipulation for exfiltration
- •Legitimate-appearing data requests
Primary Defenses
- •Explicit data access policies
- •Goal-independent access controls
- •Data minimization enforcement
Key Risks
Inter-Agent Trust Exploitation
(IATE)Exploiting trust relationships between agents by spoofing identity, forging authentication, or abusing certificate systems to impersonate trusted agents and gain unauthorized access.
Key Features
- •Agent identity spoofing
- •Authentication forgery
- •Certificate manipulation
Primary Defenses
- •Strong agent authentication
- •Certificate-based verification
- •Zero-trust architecture between agents
Key Risks
Runtime Guardrail Bypass
(RGB)Bypassing runtime security guardrails and safety mechanisms that are meant to constrain agent behavior during execution, allowing agents to perform prohibited actions.
Key Features
- •Runtime constraint bypass
- •Safety mechanism evasion
- •Behavioral limit circumvention
Primary Defenses
- •Multi-layer guardrails
- •Pre and post-execution validation
- •Atomic safety checks
Key Risks
Agent Identity Spoofing
(AIS)Creating fake agent identities or cloning legitimate agent identities to infiltrate agent networks, intercept communications, or execute unauthorized actions under false credentials.
Key Features
- •Fake identity creation
- •Agent cloning
- •Credential theft
Primary Defenses
- •Strong agent registration
- •Identity verification mechanisms
- •Credential encryption and protection
Key Risks
Covert Channel Communication
(CCC)Establishing hidden communication channels between agents or with external systems using timing patterns, steganography, or side channels to exfiltrate data or coordinate attacks without detection.
Key Features
- •Hidden communication establishment
- •Timing-based channels
- •Steganographic data hiding
Primary Defenses
- •Communication pattern analysis
- •Timing anomaly detection
- •Traffic normalization
Key Risks
Human Oversight Bypass
(HOB)Bypassing human-in-the-loop (HITL) requirements by manipulating agent workflows to execute critical actions autonomously without required human approval or verification.
Key Features
- •HITL requirement circumvention
- •Approval mechanism bypass
- •Autonomous critical action execution
Primary Defenses
- •Strict HITL enforcement for critical actions
- •Immutable approval requirements
- •Action classification validation
Key Risks
Autonomous Critical Action Execution
(ACAE)Testing agents' ability to autonomously execute high-risk or critical actions without proper human verification, including dangerous system changes, data deletions, or financial transactions.
Key Features
- •Critical action autonomous execution
- •Risk threshold bypass
- •Safety constraint circumvention
Primary Defenses
- •Critical action whitelist/blacklist
- •Risk-based verification thresholds
- •Action impact prediction
Key Risks
Approval Workflow Manipulation
(AWM)Manipulating approval workflows and decision trees to reroute critical actions away from human reviewers or to auto-approve actions that should require manual review.
Key Features
- •Workflow path manipulation
- •Decision tree bypass
- •Auto-approval exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Workflow path validation
- •Decision logic auditing
- •Strict routing rules
Key Risks
Human Verification Evasion
(HVE)Evading human verification checkpoints by fragmenting actions, timing attacks, or exploiting edge cases in verification logic to execute restricted operations without human review.
Key Features
- •Verification checkpoint bypass
- •Action fragmentation
- •Timing-based evasion
Primary Defenses
- •Aggregate action monitoring
- •Temporal correlation analysis
- •Cumulative threshold tracking
Key Risks
Decision Authority Escalation
(DAE)Escalating an agent's decision-making authority beyond its intended scope, allowing it to autonomously make critical decisions that should require higher-level human approval or oversight.
Key Features
- •Authority boundary bypass
- •Decision scope escalation
- •Privilege elevation for decisions
Primary Defenses
- •Strict decision authority boundaries
- •Scope-based access controls
- •Decision privilege validation
Key Risks
Recursive Task Generation Attack
(RTGA)Causing an agent to generate infinite or exponentially growing recursive tasks, depleting computational resources, memory, and API quotas through uncontrolled task proliferation.
Key Features
- •Infinite task loops
- •Exponential task growth
- •Task queue overflow
Primary Defenses
- •Recursion depth limits
- •Task generation rate limiting
- •Circular dependency detection
Key Risks
Token Budget Depletion Attack
(TBDA)Manipulating an agent to consume excessive tokens through verbose outputs, repeated operations, or unnecessary processing, depleting token budgets and causing cost overruns or service interruption.
Key Features
- •Token consumption maximization
- •Verbose output exploitation
- •Repeated operation triggering
Primary Defenses
- •Token budget limits per request
- •Output length restrictions
- •Cost threshold alerts
Key Risks
API Quota Exhaustion
(AQE)Causing an agent to rapidly consume API quotas for external services through excessive requests, parallel operations, or inefficient task execution, leading to service denial.
Key Features
- •Rapid API consumption
- •Parallel request flooding
- •Quota threshold exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •API rate limiting
- •Request batching and optimization
- •Quota monitoring and alerts
Key Risks
Agent Memory Exhaustion
(AME)Causing an agent to consume excessive memory through large context windows, massive data structures, or memory leak exploitation, leading to performance degradation or system crashes.
Key Features
- •Memory consumption maximization
- •Context window bloating
- •Memory leak exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Memory usage limits
- •Context window size restrictions
- •Aggressive garbage collection
Key Risks
Computational Resource Flooding
(CRF)Overwhelming an agent system with computationally expensive operations, complex reasoning tasks, or resource-intensive processing to degrade performance or cause system failure.
Key Features
- •CPU-intensive task triggering
- •Complex computation exploitation
- •Parallel processing abuse
Primary Defenses
- •Computational complexity limits
- •Task timeout enforcement
- •CPU usage quotas
Key Risks
Agent DoS via Infinite Loops
(ADIL)Triggering infinite loops in agent logic through circular reasoning, self-referential tasks, or logical paradoxes that cause the agent to hang indefinitely, denying service.
Key Features
- •Infinite loop triggering
- •Circular reasoning exploitation
- •Logical paradox injection
Primary Defenses
- •Loop detection algorithms
- •Strict timeout enforcement
- •Circular reference prevention
Key Risks
Agent Storage Exhaustion
(ASE)Causing an agent to consume excessive storage through log bloating, memory persistence, file generation, or database growth, leading to storage exhaustion and service failure.
Key Features
- •Storage consumption maximization
- •Log bloating
- •File generation abuse
Primary Defenses
- •Storage quotas and limits
- •Log rotation and cleanup
- •File retention policies
Key Risks
Cascading Failure Exploitation
(CFE)Triggering a failure in one agent that cascades through interconnected agent systems, causing widespread system degradation or complete service failure across multiple components.
Key Features
- •Chain reaction triggering
- •Multi-agent failure propagation
- •Dependency exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Circuit breaker patterns
- •Failure isolation mechanisms
- •Graceful degradation
Key Risks
Blast Radius Amplification Attack
(BRAA)Exploiting high-privilege or highly-connected agents to maximize the blast radius of a compromise, affecting the largest possible number of systems, users, or data through a single point of entry.
Key Features
- •High-privilege agent targeting
- •Hub agent exploitation
- •Maximum impact seeking
Primary Defenses
- •Principle of least privilege
- •Agent privilege segmentation
- •Blast radius containment
Key Risks
Cross-System Impact Propagation
(CSIP)Exploiting agent integrations and cross-system connections to propagate security impacts from one system to another, spreading compromises across organizational or security boundaries.
Key Features
- •Cross-boundary exploitation
- •Integration abuse
- •Multi-system propagation
Primary Defenses
- •Security boundary enforcement
- •Integration authentication
- •Cross-system isolation
Key Risks
Multi-Tenant Impact Exploitation
(MTIE)Exploiting weak tenant isolation in multi-tenant agent systems to propagate impacts from one tenant to others, causing cross-tenant data exposure or service disruption.
Key Features
- •Tenant isolation bypass
- •Cross-tenant impact
- •Shared resource exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Strong tenant isolation
- •Resource quotas per tenant
- •Separate execution contexts
Key Risks
Agent Dependency Chain Exploitation
(ADCE)Mapping and exploiting agent dependency chains to identify critical path agents whose compromise would cause maximum downstream impact, targeting architectural weak points.
Key Features
- •Dependency mapping
- •Critical path identification
- •Upstream agent targeting
Primary Defenses
- •Dependency redundancy
- •Multiple data sources
- •Critical path protection
Key Risks
Trace Evasion Simulation
(TES)Testing the agent's capability to perform actions without leaving adequate logs or traces, and evaluating the system's ability to detect and prevent unauthorized trace removal or log tampering.
Key Features
- •Log suppression detection
- •Trace removal prevention
- •Unauthorized log manipulation detection
Primary Defenses
- •Tamper-resistant logging
- •Real-time log integrity monitoring
- •Immutable audit trails
Key Risks
Role Inheritance and Permission Escalation Testing
(RIPET)Assessing how agents inherit roles and permissions from users, systems, or other agents, focusing on potential misuse, unauthorized privilege escalation, and the system's ability to attribute actions correctly under these conditions.
Key Features
- •Role inheritance tracking
- •Permission escalation detection
- •Action attribution validation
Primary Defenses
- •Strong role inheritance controls
- •Permission escalation detection
- •Comprehensive action logging
Key Risks
Downstream Tool Activation Analysis
(DTAA)Evaluating how agents trigger downstream tools or services, potentially causing untraceable actions, and assessing the system's capability to correlate actions between agents and the tools they activate across the entire chain.
Key Features
- •Tool activation tracking
- •Action chain correlation
- •Downstream traceability
Primary Defenses
- •Comprehensive tool activation logging
- •Action chain correlation
- •End-to-end traceability
Key Risks
Forensic Analysis Obfuscation Testing
(FAOT)Simulating attacks where agents perform malicious activities and attempt to obfuscate forensic evidence, assessing the effectiveness of forensic tools in detecting and analyzing such obfuscation attempts.
Key Features
- •Evidence obfuscation detection
- •Forensic data corruption prevention
- •Recovery mechanism validation
Primary Defenses
- •Tamper-resistant forensic data
- •Evidence preservation mechanisms
- •Obfuscation detection systems
Key Risks
Accountability Chain Verification
(ACV)Testing the system's mechanisms for establishing clear ownership and accountability for each agent and their actions, confirming that every action can be traced back to the responsible user, service, or organizational entity.
Key Features
- •Ownership verification
- •Action attribution validation
- •Accountability chain tracking
Primary Defenses
- •Clear ownership assignment
- •Comprehensive action attribution
- •Unbroken accountability chains
Key Risks
Log Anonymization Validation
(LAV)Ensuring that agent-provided traces do not contain sensitive data to avoid regulatory violations, while maintaining sufficient detail for accountability and forensic analysis.
Key Features
- •Sensitive data detection
- •PII removal validation
- •Compliance verification
Primary Defenses
- •Automated data redaction
- •PII detection and removal
- •Compliance-aware logging
Key Risks
Physical System Manipulation Testing
(PSMT)Testing agent control over physical infrastructure such as industrial systems or robotics to identify operational disruptions, unsafe command execution, and failsafe mechanism effectiveness.
Key Features
- •Physical infrastructure control testing
- •Unsafe command injection
- •Operational limit boundary testing
Primary Defenses
- •Command validation against operational limits
- •Multi-layer safety boundaries
- •Real-time anomaly detection
Key Risks
IoT Device Interaction Security Testing
(IDIST)Assessing agent management of IoT devices, focusing on command validation, unauthorized access restriction, and communication channel security to identify spoofing, interception, and configuration exploitation vulnerabilities.
Key Features
- •IoT command validation testing
- •Communication channel security assessment
- •Device configuration exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •End-to-end encryption for IoT communications
- •Strong device authentication
- •Command authorization validation
Key Risks
Critical Infrastructure Access Testing
(CIAT)Evaluating agent permissions when interacting with critical infrastructure systems to ensure proper access control boundary enforcement, prevent unauthorized privilege escalation, and protect against insider threat scenarios.
Key Features
- •Permission boundary testing
- •Privilege escalation prevention
- •Access control validation
Primary Defenses
- •Principle of least privilege
- •Role-based access control (RBAC)
- •Segregation of duties enforcement
Key Risks
Safety System Bypass Testing
(SSBT)Simulating attacks on agent safety monitoring and enforcement mechanisms in industrial or operational systems, testing detection and response to conditions outside operational scope, and evaluating safety parameter violation handling.
Key Features
- •Safety monitoring attack simulation
- •Parameter violation testing
- •Safety mechanism disable attempts
Primary Defenses
- •Multi-layer safety validation
- •Redundant safety sensors
- •Tamper-resistant safety controls
Key Risks
Real-Time Monitoring and Anomaly Detection
(RTMAD)Testing agent ability to log critical system interactions, detect anomalies, and generate security alerts in real time, including introduction of abnormal patterns and evaluation of log protection against tampering.
Key Features
- •Real-time anomaly detection
- •Comprehensive event logging
- •Alert generation testing
Primary Defenses
- •Comprehensive logging of all critical events
- •Real-time anomaly detection algorithms
- •Tamper-resistant log storage
Key Risks
Failsafe Mechanism Validation
(FMV)Assessing robustness of failsafe mechanisms by simulating system errors, unexpected shutdowns, or hardware failures, testing agent transition to failsafe state without compromising critical functionality, and validating emergency procedures.
Key Features
- •Failure scenario simulation
- •Failsafe state transition testing
- •System stability validation
Primary Defenses
- •Automatic failsafe state activation
- •Redundant system components
- •Graceful degradation capabilities
Key Risks
Agent Command and Action Validation
(ACAV)Testing validation process for all agent commands to critical systems, ensuring unauthorized or unsafe actions are blocked, command execution aligns with operational parameters, and sandbox escape attempts are detected.
Key Features
- •Command validation testing
- •Safety parameter enforcement
- •Conflicting command resolution
Primary Defenses
- •Comprehensive command validation
- •Whitelist-based command authorization
- •Real-time safety parameter checks
Key Risks
Ethical Guidelines for Agentic AI Attacks
When working with agentic ai attacks techniques, always follow these ethical guidelines:
- • Only test on systems you own or have explicit written permission to test
- • Focus on building better defenses, not conducting attacks
- • Follow responsible disclosure practices for any vulnerabilities found
- • Document and report findings to improve security for everyone
- • Consider the potential impact on users and society
- • Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations
Agentic AI Attacks
Multi-agent security testing and autonomous system exploitation techniques
Available Techniques
Multi-Agent Orchestration Attack
(MAOA)Exploitation of communication vulnerabilities between multiple AI agents in an orchestrated system, manipulating inter-agent messaging to achieve unauthorized objectives.
Key Features
- •Inter-agent message injection
- •Orchestration layer manipulation
- •Agent coordination disruption
Primary Defenses
- •Message signing and verification
- •Agent authentication protocols
- •Communication encryption
Key Risks
Agent Goal Manipulation
(AGM)Manipulation of an autonomous agent's objectives or goals through prompt injection, context manipulation, or system prompt override, causing the agent to pursue attacker-controlled objectives.
Key Features
- •Objective redefinition
- •Goal drift induction
- •Priority manipulation
Primary Defenses
- •Immutable goal specifications
- •Goal validation checkpoints
- •System prompt protection
Key Risks
Agent Permission Escalation
(APE)Exploitation of permission and access control vulnerabilities in agentic systems to grant an agent unauthorized capabilities or access to restricted resources.
Key Features
- •Role boundary violation
- •Capability expansion attacks
- •Permission inheritance exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Principle of least privilege
- •Explicit permission grants per action
- •Permission validation at execution time
Key Risks
Multi-Agent Collusion Attack
(MACA)Coordinating multiple agents to work together maliciously, bypassing individual agent restrictions through distributed, collaborative exploitation.
Key Features
- •Distributed task splitting
- •Information sharing between compromised agents
- •Collective policy bypass
Primary Defenses
- •Agent isolation and sandboxing
- •Information flow controls
- •Behavioral correlation analysis
Key Risks
Confused Deputy Attack
(CDA)Tricking a privileged agent into performing unauthorized actions on behalf of an attacker by exploiting the agent's trust in its inputs or tools.
Key Features
- •Privilege abuse through trusted paths
- •Tool invocation manipulation
- •Authority exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Explicit authorization for tool use
- •Request origin validation
- •Action authorization verification
Key Risks
Tool Integration Exploitation
(TIE)Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the integration between AI agents and external tools, functions, or APIs, leading to unauthorized tool usage or malicious function calls.
Key Features
- •Function calling manipulation
- •Tool parameter injection
- •API endpoint exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Strict parameter validation
- •Function call authorization
- •Tool capability restrictions
Key Risks
Agent Action Untraceability
(AAU)Techniques to make agent actions difficult or impossible to trace, audit, or attribute, enabling covert malicious activities within agentic systems.
Key Features
- •Log suppression
- •Action obfuscation
- •Attribution confusion
Primary Defenses
- •Immutable audit logs
- •Comprehensive action logging
- •Log integrity verification
Key Risks
Recursive Agent Subversion
(RAS)Self-propagating exploitation where a compromised agent subverts other agents it interacts with, creating a chain of compromised agents throughout the system.
Key Features
- •Agent-to-agent infection
- •Payload propagation
- •Cascading compromise
Primary Defenses
- •Agent sandboxing and isolation
- •Communication sanitization
- •Behavioral anomaly detection
Key Risks
Excessive Agency Exploitation
(EAE)Exploitation of agents that have been granted excessive permissions, capabilities, or autonomy beyond what is necessary for their intended function.
Key Features
- •Over-permission abuse
- •Scope creep exploitation
- •Capability misuse
Primary Defenses
- •Strict permission minimization
- •Role-based capability constraints
- •Regular permission audits
Key Risks
Agent Feedback Loop Poisoning
(AFLP)Manipulation of learning or improvement feedback loops in agents to gradually corrupt their behavior, decision-making, or learned patterns over time.
Key Features
- •Gradual behavior corruption
- •Feedback manipulation
- •Learning process poisoning
Primary Defenses
- •Feedback validation and filtering
- •Learning rate limits
- •Behavior drift detection
Key Risks
Data Exfiltration Testing
(DET)Testing agents' ability to prevent unauthorized data access and exfiltration across session boundaries, user contexts, and application scopes through isolation control validation.
Key Features
- •Cross-session data isolation testing
- •Cross-customer data boundary validation
- •Cross-application data leakage testing
Primary Defenses
- •Strong session-level data isolation
- •Customer-specific data boundaries
- •Application context segregation
Key Risks
Goal Extraction Attempt Testing
(GEAT)Testing agent resilience against adversarial attempts to extract internal goals, objectives, or instructions through probing, escalation tactics, or dialog manipulation.
Key Features
- •Goal disclosure resistance testing
- •System prompt extraction prevention
- •Objective inference resistance
Primary Defenses
- •System prompt isolation and protection
- •Goal disclosure filters
- •Instruction redaction mechanisms
Key Risks
Hallucination Chain Exploitation
(HCE)Exploiting cascading hallucinations across multiple agents in a chain, where false information from one agent propagates and amplifies through subsequent agents, compounding misinformation.
Key Features
- •Cascading false outputs
- •Multi-step hallucination propagation
- •Compounding misinformation
Primary Defenses
- •Multi-source verification requirements
- •Hallucination detection at each step
- •Fact-checking integration
Key Risks
Orchestrator Poisoning Attack
(OPA)Targeting the master orchestrator or coordination layer that manages multiple agents, compromising the central decision-making and task distribution system to control all subordinate agents.
Key Features
- •Master agent compromise
- •Coordination layer manipulation
- •Task distribution control
Primary Defenses
- •Orchestrator hardening and isolation
- •Master agent authentication
- •Coordination validation
Key Risks
Orchestrator State Poisoning via Agent Responses
(OSPAR)Testing orchestrator resilience to having its internal memory, context, or planning capabilities corrupted by malicious or manipulated responses from the agents it manages, causing degraded decision-making across the system.
Key Features
- •Agent response manipulation
- •Orchestrator context corruption
- •Planning capability poisoning
Primary Defenses
- •Agent response validation and sanitization
- •State integrity verification
- •Context corruption detection
Key Risks
Data Exfiltration via Goal Inference
(DEGI)Manipulating an agent's goal inference mechanisms to extract sensitive data by framing data access as necessary to achieve legitimate-seeming objectives.
Key Features
- •Goal-justified data access
- •Objective manipulation for exfiltration
- •Legitimate-appearing data requests
Primary Defenses
- •Explicit data access policies
- •Goal-independent access controls
- •Data minimization enforcement
Key Risks
Inter-Agent Trust Exploitation
(IATE)Exploiting trust relationships between agents by spoofing identity, forging authentication, or abusing certificate systems to impersonate trusted agents and gain unauthorized access.
Key Features
- •Agent identity spoofing
- •Authentication forgery
- •Certificate manipulation
Primary Defenses
- •Strong agent authentication
- •Certificate-based verification
- •Zero-trust architecture between agents
Key Risks
Runtime Guardrail Bypass
(RGB)Bypassing runtime security guardrails and safety mechanisms that are meant to constrain agent behavior during execution, allowing agents to perform prohibited actions.
Key Features
- •Runtime constraint bypass
- •Safety mechanism evasion
- •Behavioral limit circumvention
Primary Defenses
- •Multi-layer guardrails
- •Pre and post-execution validation
- •Atomic safety checks
Key Risks
Agent Identity Spoofing
(AIS)Creating fake agent identities or cloning legitimate agent identities to infiltrate agent networks, intercept communications, or execute unauthorized actions under false credentials.
Key Features
- •Fake identity creation
- •Agent cloning
- •Credential theft
Primary Defenses
- •Strong agent registration
- •Identity verification mechanisms
- •Credential encryption and protection
Key Risks
Covert Channel Communication
(CCC)Establishing hidden communication channels between agents or with external systems using timing patterns, steganography, or side channels to exfiltrate data or coordinate attacks without detection.
Key Features
- •Hidden communication establishment
- •Timing-based channels
- •Steganographic data hiding
Primary Defenses
- •Communication pattern analysis
- •Timing anomaly detection
- •Traffic normalization
Key Risks
Human Oversight Bypass
(HOB)Bypassing human-in-the-loop (HITL) requirements by manipulating agent workflows to execute critical actions autonomously without required human approval or verification.
Key Features
- •HITL requirement circumvention
- •Approval mechanism bypass
- •Autonomous critical action execution
Primary Defenses
- •Strict HITL enforcement for critical actions
- •Immutable approval requirements
- •Action classification validation
Key Risks
Autonomous Critical Action Execution
(ACAE)Testing agents' ability to autonomously execute high-risk or critical actions without proper human verification, including dangerous system changes, data deletions, or financial transactions.
Key Features
- •Critical action autonomous execution
- •Risk threshold bypass
- •Safety constraint circumvention
Primary Defenses
- •Critical action whitelist/blacklist
- •Risk-based verification thresholds
- •Action impact prediction
Key Risks
Approval Workflow Manipulation
(AWM)Manipulating approval workflows and decision trees to reroute critical actions away from human reviewers or to auto-approve actions that should require manual review.
Key Features
- •Workflow path manipulation
- •Decision tree bypass
- •Auto-approval exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Workflow path validation
- •Decision logic auditing
- •Strict routing rules
Key Risks
Human Verification Evasion
(HVE)Evading human verification checkpoints by fragmenting actions, timing attacks, or exploiting edge cases in verification logic to execute restricted operations without human review.
Key Features
- •Verification checkpoint bypass
- •Action fragmentation
- •Timing-based evasion
Primary Defenses
- •Aggregate action monitoring
- •Temporal correlation analysis
- •Cumulative threshold tracking
Key Risks
Decision Authority Escalation
(DAE)Escalating an agent's decision-making authority beyond its intended scope, allowing it to autonomously make critical decisions that should require higher-level human approval or oversight.
Key Features
- •Authority boundary bypass
- •Decision scope escalation
- •Privilege elevation for decisions
Primary Defenses
- •Strict decision authority boundaries
- •Scope-based access controls
- •Decision privilege validation
Key Risks
Recursive Task Generation Attack
(RTGA)Causing an agent to generate infinite or exponentially growing recursive tasks, depleting computational resources, memory, and API quotas through uncontrolled task proliferation.
Key Features
- •Infinite task loops
- •Exponential task growth
- •Task queue overflow
Primary Defenses
- •Recursion depth limits
- •Task generation rate limiting
- •Circular dependency detection
Key Risks
Token Budget Depletion Attack
(TBDA)Manipulating an agent to consume excessive tokens through verbose outputs, repeated operations, or unnecessary processing, depleting token budgets and causing cost overruns or service interruption.
Key Features
- •Token consumption maximization
- •Verbose output exploitation
- •Repeated operation triggering
Primary Defenses
- •Token budget limits per request
- •Output length restrictions
- •Cost threshold alerts
Key Risks
API Quota Exhaustion
(AQE)Causing an agent to rapidly consume API quotas for external services through excessive requests, parallel operations, or inefficient task execution, leading to service denial.
Key Features
- •Rapid API consumption
- •Parallel request flooding
- •Quota threshold exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •API rate limiting
- •Request batching and optimization
- •Quota monitoring and alerts
Key Risks
Agent Memory Exhaustion
(AME)Causing an agent to consume excessive memory through large context windows, massive data structures, or memory leak exploitation, leading to performance degradation or system crashes.
Key Features
- •Memory consumption maximization
- •Context window bloating
- •Memory leak exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Memory usage limits
- •Context window size restrictions
- •Aggressive garbage collection
Key Risks
Computational Resource Flooding
(CRF)Overwhelming an agent system with computationally expensive operations, complex reasoning tasks, or resource-intensive processing to degrade performance or cause system failure.
Key Features
- •CPU-intensive task triggering
- •Complex computation exploitation
- •Parallel processing abuse
Primary Defenses
- •Computational complexity limits
- •Task timeout enforcement
- •CPU usage quotas
Key Risks
Agent DoS via Infinite Loops
(ADIL)Triggering infinite loops in agent logic through circular reasoning, self-referential tasks, or logical paradoxes that cause the agent to hang indefinitely, denying service.
Key Features
- •Infinite loop triggering
- •Circular reasoning exploitation
- •Logical paradox injection
Primary Defenses
- •Loop detection algorithms
- •Strict timeout enforcement
- •Circular reference prevention
Key Risks
Agent Storage Exhaustion
(ASE)Causing an agent to consume excessive storage through log bloating, memory persistence, file generation, or database growth, leading to storage exhaustion and service failure.
Key Features
- •Storage consumption maximization
- •Log bloating
- •File generation abuse
Primary Defenses
- •Storage quotas and limits
- •Log rotation and cleanup
- •File retention policies
Key Risks
Cascading Failure Exploitation
(CFE)Triggering a failure in one agent that cascades through interconnected agent systems, causing widespread system degradation or complete service failure across multiple components.
Key Features
- •Chain reaction triggering
- •Multi-agent failure propagation
- •Dependency exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Circuit breaker patterns
- •Failure isolation mechanisms
- •Graceful degradation
Key Risks
Blast Radius Amplification Attack
(BRAA)Exploiting high-privilege or highly-connected agents to maximize the blast radius of a compromise, affecting the largest possible number of systems, users, or data through a single point of entry.
Key Features
- •High-privilege agent targeting
- •Hub agent exploitation
- •Maximum impact seeking
Primary Defenses
- •Principle of least privilege
- •Agent privilege segmentation
- •Blast radius containment
Key Risks
Cross-System Impact Propagation
(CSIP)Exploiting agent integrations and cross-system connections to propagate security impacts from one system to another, spreading compromises across organizational or security boundaries.
Key Features
- •Cross-boundary exploitation
- •Integration abuse
- •Multi-system propagation
Primary Defenses
- •Security boundary enforcement
- •Integration authentication
- •Cross-system isolation
Key Risks
Multi-Tenant Impact Exploitation
(MTIE)Exploiting weak tenant isolation in multi-tenant agent systems to propagate impacts from one tenant to others, causing cross-tenant data exposure or service disruption.
Key Features
- •Tenant isolation bypass
- •Cross-tenant impact
- •Shared resource exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •Strong tenant isolation
- •Resource quotas per tenant
- •Separate execution contexts
Key Risks
Agent Dependency Chain Exploitation
(ADCE)Mapping and exploiting agent dependency chains to identify critical path agents whose compromise would cause maximum downstream impact, targeting architectural weak points.
Key Features
- •Dependency mapping
- •Critical path identification
- •Upstream agent targeting
Primary Defenses
- •Dependency redundancy
- •Multiple data sources
- •Critical path protection
Key Risks
Trace Evasion Simulation
(TES)Testing the agent's capability to perform actions without leaving adequate logs or traces, and evaluating the system's ability to detect and prevent unauthorized trace removal or log tampering.
Key Features
- •Log suppression detection
- •Trace removal prevention
- •Unauthorized log manipulation detection
Primary Defenses
- •Tamper-resistant logging
- •Real-time log integrity monitoring
- •Immutable audit trails
Key Risks
Role Inheritance and Permission Escalation Testing
(RIPET)Assessing how agents inherit roles and permissions from users, systems, or other agents, focusing on potential misuse, unauthorized privilege escalation, and the system's ability to attribute actions correctly under these conditions.
Key Features
- •Role inheritance tracking
- •Permission escalation detection
- •Action attribution validation
Primary Defenses
- •Strong role inheritance controls
- •Permission escalation detection
- •Comprehensive action logging
Key Risks
Downstream Tool Activation Analysis
(DTAA)Evaluating how agents trigger downstream tools or services, potentially causing untraceable actions, and assessing the system's capability to correlate actions between agents and the tools they activate across the entire chain.
Key Features
- •Tool activation tracking
- •Action chain correlation
- •Downstream traceability
Primary Defenses
- •Comprehensive tool activation logging
- •Action chain correlation
- •End-to-end traceability
Key Risks
Forensic Analysis Obfuscation Testing
(FAOT)Simulating attacks where agents perform malicious activities and attempt to obfuscate forensic evidence, assessing the effectiveness of forensic tools in detecting and analyzing such obfuscation attempts.
Key Features
- •Evidence obfuscation detection
- •Forensic data corruption prevention
- •Recovery mechanism validation
Primary Defenses
- •Tamper-resistant forensic data
- •Evidence preservation mechanisms
- •Obfuscation detection systems
Key Risks
Accountability Chain Verification
(ACV)Testing the system's mechanisms for establishing clear ownership and accountability for each agent and their actions, confirming that every action can be traced back to the responsible user, service, or organizational entity.
Key Features
- •Ownership verification
- •Action attribution validation
- •Accountability chain tracking
Primary Defenses
- •Clear ownership assignment
- •Comprehensive action attribution
- •Unbroken accountability chains
Key Risks
Log Anonymization Validation
(LAV)Ensuring that agent-provided traces do not contain sensitive data to avoid regulatory violations, while maintaining sufficient detail for accountability and forensic analysis.
Key Features
- •Sensitive data detection
- •PII removal validation
- •Compliance verification
Primary Defenses
- •Automated data redaction
- •PII detection and removal
- •Compliance-aware logging
Key Risks
Physical System Manipulation Testing
(PSMT)Testing agent control over physical infrastructure such as industrial systems or robotics to identify operational disruptions, unsafe command execution, and failsafe mechanism effectiveness.
Key Features
- •Physical infrastructure control testing
- •Unsafe command injection
- •Operational limit boundary testing
Primary Defenses
- •Command validation against operational limits
- •Multi-layer safety boundaries
- •Real-time anomaly detection
Key Risks
IoT Device Interaction Security Testing
(IDIST)Assessing agent management of IoT devices, focusing on command validation, unauthorized access restriction, and communication channel security to identify spoofing, interception, and configuration exploitation vulnerabilities.
Key Features
- •IoT command validation testing
- •Communication channel security assessment
- •Device configuration exploitation
Primary Defenses
- •End-to-end encryption for IoT communications
- •Strong device authentication
- •Command authorization validation
Key Risks
Critical Infrastructure Access Testing
(CIAT)Evaluating agent permissions when interacting with critical infrastructure systems to ensure proper access control boundary enforcement, prevent unauthorized privilege escalation, and protect against insider threat scenarios.
Key Features
- •Permission boundary testing
- •Privilege escalation prevention
- •Access control validation
Primary Defenses
- •Principle of least privilege
- •Role-based access control (RBAC)
- •Segregation of duties enforcement
Key Risks
Safety System Bypass Testing
(SSBT)Simulating attacks on agent safety monitoring and enforcement mechanisms in industrial or operational systems, testing detection and response to conditions outside operational scope, and evaluating safety parameter violation handling.
Key Features
- •Safety monitoring attack simulation
- •Parameter violation testing
- •Safety mechanism disable attempts
Primary Defenses
- •Multi-layer safety validation
- •Redundant safety sensors
- •Tamper-resistant safety controls
Key Risks
Real-Time Monitoring and Anomaly Detection
(RTMAD)Testing agent ability to log critical system interactions, detect anomalies, and generate security alerts in real time, including introduction of abnormal patterns and evaluation of log protection against tampering.
Key Features
- •Real-time anomaly detection
- •Comprehensive event logging
- •Alert generation testing
Primary Defenses
- •Comprehensive logging of all critical events
- •Real-time anomaly detection algorithms
- •Tamper-resistant log storage
Key Risks
Failsafe Mechanism Validation
(FMV)Assessing robustness of failsafe mechanisms by simulating system errors, unexpected shutdowns, or hardware failures, testing agent transition to failsafe state without compromising critical functionality, and validating emergency procedures.
Key Features
- •Failure scenario simulation
- •Failsafe state transition testing
- •System stability validation
Primary Defenses
- •Automatic failsafe state activation
- •Redundant system components
- •Graceful degradation capabilities
Key Risks
Agent Command and Action Validation
(ACAV)Testing validation process for all agent commands to critical systems, ensuring unauthorized or unsafe actions are blocked, command execution aligns with operational parameters, and sandbox escape attempts are detected.
Key Features
- •Command validation testing
- •Safety parameter enforcement
- •Conflicting command resolution
Primary Defenses
- •Comprehensive command validation
- •Whitelist-based command authorization
- •Real-time safety parameter checks
Key Risks
Ethical Guidelines for Agentic AI Attacks
When working with agentic ai attacks techniques, always follow these ethical guidelines:
- • Only test on systems you own or have explicit written permission to test
- • Focus on building better defenses, not conducting attacks
- • Follow responsible disclosure practices for any vulnerabilities found
- • Document and report findings to improve security for everyone
- • Consider the potential impact on users and society
- • Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations