Agentic Design

Patterns
⚖️

Constitutional AI Evaluation Framework(CAI-Eval)

Anthropic's framework for evaluating AI safety through constitutional principles, including jailbreak resistance testing and harmlessness assessment.

Complexity: highEvaluation and Monitoring

🎯 30-Second Overview

Pattern: Anthropic's framework for evaluating AI safety through constitutional principles with jailbreak resistance testing

Why: Provides robust defense against adversarial attacks while maintaining transparent, principle-based AI alignment

Key Insight: Constitutional Classifiers achieve 95.6% jailbreak blocking vs 14% baseline with only 0.38% over-refusal

⚡ Quick Implementation

1Constitution:Define principles & rules for AI behavior
2Classifiers:Train input/output constitutional classifiers
3Red Team:Conduct extensive adversarial testing
4Evaluate:Measure jailbreak resistance & harmlessness
5Deploy:Guard production systems with classifiers
Example: constitution → classifier_training → red_team_testing → jailbreak_eval → production_deploy

📋 Do's & Don'ts

✅Use both input and output classifiers for comprehensive protection
✅Conduct extensive red team testing (3000+ hours)
✅Test against synthetic and human-generated jailbreaks
✅Balance safety with usability (monitor over-refusal rates)
✅Use constitutional principles for transparent AI alignment
❌Rely solely on base model safety without additional protection
❌Skip evaluation of computational overhead costs
❌Ignore edge cases and creative jailbreak attempts
❌Deploy without measuring over-refusal impact on users
❌Assume classifiers prevent all universal jailbreaks

🚦 When to Use

Use When

  • • Production AI safety requirements
  • • High-stakes deployment scenarios
  • • Public-facing AI applications
  • • Regulatory compliance needs

Avoid When

  • • Internal development tools only
  • • Non-safety-critical applications
  • • Resource-constrained environments
  • • Research-only systems

📊 Key Metrics

Jailbreak Success Rate
Percentage of successful attacks (target <5%)
Over-refusal Rate
False positive safety blocks (target <1%)
Constitutional Adherence
Compliance with defined principles (0-10)
Red Team Resistance
Performance against human adversaries
Computational Overhead
Additional processing cost (+20-30%)
Universal Jailbreak Detection
Cross-query attack prevention

💡 Top Use Cases

Enterprise AI Safety: Production chatbots with 95%+ jailbreak resistance for customer service
Educational AI Platforms: Safe AI tutors preventing harmful content generation for students
Healthcare AI Systems: Constitutional compliance for medical advice and patient interaction
Content Moderation: AI moderators with robust adversarial attack resistance
Government AI Services: Public-facing AI with transparency and constitutional alignment

References & Further Reading

Deepen your understanding with these curated resources

Core Anthropic Research

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback - Anthropic (2022)

Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against universal jailbreaks - Anthropic (2024)

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback (arXiv:2212.08073)

Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning with Public Input - Anthropic

Technical Implementation

Mitigate jailbreaks and prompt injections - Anthropic Documentation

Constitutional Classifiers Public Demo - Jailbreak Challenge

Progress from our Frontier Red Team - Anthropic (2024)

Anthropic Safety Research Hub

Industry Analysis & News

Anthropics Constitutional Classifiers vs. AI Jailbreakers - Prompt Engineering

Anthropic Introduces Constitutional Classifiers - MarkTechPost

Anthropic Dares You To Try To Jailbreak Claude AI - BGR

Anthropic challenges users to jailbreak AI model - Techzine Global

Research Community

AI Alignment Forum - Constitutional AI Discussions

LessWrong - Constitutional AI Research

AI Safety Research - Constitutional Approaches

Partnership on AI - Safety Guidelines

Contribute to this collection

Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.

Contribute

Patterns

closed

Loading...