Loading...
🔒
CybersecEval 3(CSE3)
Meta's comprehensive cybersecurity benchmark for evaluating security risks of LLM agents in autonomous and multi-agent settings.
Complexity: highEvaluation and Monitoring
🎯 30-Second Overview
Pattern: Meta's comprehensive cybersecurity benchmark evaluating 8 risks across autonomous and multi-agent scenarios
Why: Assesses offensive capabilities including social engineering, vulnerability discovery, and autonomous cyber operations
Key Insight: Llama 3 405B outperforms GPT-4 Turbo by 23% in vulnerability exploitation while requiring Llama Guard 3 mitigation
⚡ Quick Implementation
1Setup:Install CybersecEval 3 framework and dependencies
2Configure:Set up 8 risk assessment categories for evaluation
3Test:Run autonomous and multi-agent security scenarios
4Guard:Deploy Llama Guard 3 for risk mitigation
5Analyze:Review offensive/defensive capability assessments
Example: cybersec_eval = CybersecEval3(model=llm, risks=all_8, guardrails=llama_guard_3)
📋 Do's & Don'ts
✅Test across all 8 risk categories for comprehensive security assessment
✅Deploy Llama Guard 3 to detect and block cyberattack aid requests
✅Evaluate both autonomous and multi-agent offensive capabilities
✅Monitor for social engineering and spear-phishing attack generation
✅Assess vulnerability discovery and exploitation capabilities
❌Deploy models without proper guardrails and monitoring systems
❌Ignore third-party risks from autonomous offensive operations
❌Skip evaluation of manual cyber-operation scaling capabilities
❌Overlook application developer and end-user security risks
❌Assume offensive capabilities won't be misused without mitigation
🚦 When to Use
Use When
- • Security assessment of autonomous LLM agents
- • Evaluating cybersecurity risks in multi-agent systems
- • Pre-deployment security validation for LLMs
- • Implementing guardrails and risk mitigation strategies
- • Research on offensive and defensive AI capabilities
Avoid When
- • General performance benchmarking (non-security focused)
- • Models without cybersecurity risk considerations
- • Environments without proper security monitoring
- • Academic research without ethical oversight
- • Systems not requiring autonomous security evaluation
📊 Key Metrics
Third-Party Risk Score
Assessment across 4 offensive capability categories
Developer/End-User Risk
Security risks to application developers and users
Autonomous Hacking Capability
Success rate in autonomous cyber operation challenges
Vulnerability Discovery Rate
Effectiveness at finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities
Social Engineering Success
Ability to generate persuasive spear-phishing attacks
Guardrail Effectiveness
Llama Guard 3 detection and blocking success rate
💡 Top Use Cases
Security Research: Evaluating Llama 3 405B vulnerability discovery capabilities (23% better than GPT-4 Turbo)
Risk Mitigation: Deploying Llama Guard 3 to detect and block cyberattack aid requests in production
Autonomous Agent Security: Testing multi-agent frameworks for offensive cyber operation capabilities
Social Engineering Assessment: Evaluating spear-phishing attack generation and personalized deception risks
Enterprise Security: Pre-deployment cybersecurity validation for LLM-based applications and services
References & Further Reading
Deepen your understanding with these curated resources
Contribute to this collection
Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.
🔒
CybersecEval 3(CSE3)
Meta's comprehensive cybersecurity benchmark for evaluating security risks of LLM agents in autonomous and multi-agent settings.
Complexity: highEvaluation and Monitoring
🎯 30-Second Overview
Pattern: Meta's comprehensive cybersecurity benchmark evaluating 8 risks across autonomous and multi-agent scenarios
Why: Assesses offensive capabilities including social engineering, vulnerability discovery, and autonomous cyber operations
Key Insight: Llama 3 405B outperforms GPT-4 Turbo by 23% in vulnerability exploitation while requiring Llama Guard 3 mitigation
⚡ Quick Implementation
1Setup:Install CybersecEval 3 framework and dependencies
2Configure:Set up 8 risk assessment categories for evaluation
3Test:Run autonomous and multi-agent security scenarios
4Guard:Deploy Llama Guard 3 for risk mitigation
5Analyze:Review offensive/defensive capability assessments
Example: cybersec_eval = CybersecEval3(model=llm, risks=all_8, guardrails=llama_guard_3)
📋 Do's & Don'ts
✅Test across all 8 risk categories for comprehensive security assessment
✅Deploy Llama Guard 3 to detect and block cyberattack aid requests
✅Evaluate both autonomous and multi-agent offensive capabilities
✅Monitor for social engineering and spear-phishing attack generation
✅Assess vulnerability discovery and exploitation capabilities
❌Deploy models without proper guardrails and monitoring systems
❌Ignore third-party risks from autonomous offensive operations
❌Skip evaluation of manual cyber-operation scaling capabilities
❌Overlook application developer and end-user security risks
❌Assume offensive capabilities won't be misused without mitigation
🚦 When to Use
Use When
- • Security assessment of autonomous LLM agents
- • Evaluating cybersecurity risks in multi-agent systems
- • Pre-deployment security validation for LLMs
- • Implementing guardrails and risk mitigation strategies
- • Research on offensive and defensive AI capabilities
Avoid When
- • General performance benchmarking (non-security focused)
- • Models without cybersecurity risk considerations
- • Environments without proper security monitoring
- • Academic research without ethical oversight
- • Systems not requiring autonomous security evaluation
📊 Key Metrics
Third-Party Risk Score
Assessment across 4 offensive capability categories
Developer/End-User Risk
Security risks to application developers and users
Autonomous Hacking Capability
Success rate in autonomous cyber operation challenges
Vulnerability Discovery Rate
Effectiveness at finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities
Social Engineering Success
Ability to generate persuasive spear-phishing attacks
Guardrail Effectiveness
Llama Guard 3 detection and blocking success rate
💡 Top Use Cases
Security Research: Evaluating Llama 3 405B vulnerability discovery capabilities (23% better than GPT-4 Turbo)
Risk Mitigation: Deploying Llama Guard 3 to detect and block cyberattack aid requests in production
Autonomous Agent Security: Testing multi-agent frameworks for offensive cyber operation capabilities
Social Engineering Assessment: Evaluating spear-phishing attack generation and personalized deception risks
Enterprise Security: Pre-deployment cybersecurity validation for LLM-based applications and services
References & Further Reading
Deepen your understanding with these curated resources
Contribute to this collection
Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.