Loading...
HELM Agent Evaluation Framework(HELM-AE)
Stanford CRFM's Holistic Evaluation of Language Models extended for agent capabilities, measuring 7 metrics across multimodal tasks, tool use, and simulation environments.
๐ฏ 30-Second Overview
Pattern: Stanford CRFM's holistic framework evaluating agents across 7 metrics and 42 scenarios
Why: Moves beyond accuracy to comprehensive assessment including fairness, robustness, and efficiency trade-offs
Key Insight: Reveals critical trade-offs between metrics and ensures non-accuracy dimensions aren't second-class citizens
โก Quick Implementation
The 7 Core Metrics
Accuracy
Traditional performance measurement across task scenarios
Calibration
Whether the model knows what it doesn't know - confidence alignment
Robustness
Performance under perturbations (e.g., typos, input variations)
Fairness
Performance consistency across different groups and demographics
Bias
Systematic unfairness detection in model outputs and decisions
Toxicity
Generation of harmful, offensive, or dangerous content
Efficiency
Computational resource usage and inference speed optimization
๐ Do's & Don'ts
๐ฆ When to Use
Use When
- โข Comprehensive model comparison across multiple dimensions
- โข Academic research requiring standardized evaluation
- โข Enterprise deployment decisions needing holistic assessment
- โข Responsible AI evaluation including bias and toxicity
- โข Multi-modal agent capability assessment
Avoid When
- โข Quick single-metric performance checks
- โข Domain-specific benchmarks outside HELM scenarios
- โข Real-time evaluation needs (computationally intensive)
- โข Custom evaluation scenarios without standardization needs
- โข Budget-constrained evaluation (requires significant compute)
๐ Key Metrics
๐ก Top Use Cases
References & Further Reading
Deepen your understanding with these curated resources
Contribute to this collection
Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.
HELM Agent Evaluation Framework(HELM-AE)
Stanford CRFM's Holistic Evaluation of Language Models extended for agent capabilities, measuring 7 metrics across multimodal tasks, tool use, and simulation environments.
๐ฏ 30-Second Overview
Pattern: Stanford CRFM's holistic framework evaluating agents across 7 metrics and 42 scenarios
Why: Moves beyond accuracy to comprehensive assessment including fairness, robustness, and efficiency trade-offs
Key Insight: Reveals critical trade-offs between metrics and ensures non-accuracy dimensions aren't second-class citizens
โก Quick Implementation
The 7 Core Metrics
Accuracy
Traditional performance measurement across task scenarios
Calibration
Whether the model knows what it doesn't know - confidence alignment
Robustness
Performance under perturbations (e.g., typos, input variations)
Fairness
Performance consistency across different groups and demographics
Bias
Systematic unfairness detection in model outputs and decisions
Toxicity
Generation of harmful, offensive, or dangerous content
Efficiency
Computational resource usage and inference speed optimization
๐ Do's & Don'ts
๐ฆ When to Use
Use When
- โข Comprehensive model comparison across multiple dimensions
- โข Academic research requiring standardized evaluation
- โข Enterprise deployment decisions needing holistic assessment
- โข Responsible AI evaluation including bias and toxicity
- โข Multi-modal agent capability assessment
Avoid When
- โข Quick single-metric performance checks
- โข Domain-specific benchmarks outside HELM scenarios
- โข Real-time evaluation needs (computationally intensive)
- โข Custom evaluation scenarios without standardization needs
- โข Budget-constrained evaluation (requires significant compute)
๐ Key Metrics
๐ก Top Use Cases
References & Further Reading
Deepen your understanding with these curated resources
Contribute to this collection
Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.