Patterns
πŸ•ΈοΈ

Graph RAG(GRAG)

Knowledge graph-enhanced RAG using entity relationships and community detection for global sensemaking queries

Complexity: highKnowledge Retrieval (RAG)

🎯 30-Second Overview

Pattern: Knowledge graph-based RAG with community detection and hierarchical summarization for large-scale reasoning

Why: Enables complex multi-hop reasoning and relationship understanding through structured graph traversal

Key Insight: Microsoft's approach uses community detection algorithms to create hierarchical summaries for global and local reasoning

⚑ Quick Implementation

1Extract & Build:NER/RE to extract entities and relations, build knowledge graph
2Index & Store:Create graph indexes and hybrid text-vector search capabilities
3Query & Map:Parse query entities and map to graph nodes
4Traverse & Retrieve:Multi-hop graph traversal with bounded expansion
5Assemble & Generate:Serialize graph context and generate response
Example: query β†’ entity_linking β†’ graph_traversal β†’ subgraph_assembly β†’ llm_generation β†’ response

πŸ“‹ Do's & Don'ts

βœ…Implement community detection algorithms for large-scale graph summarization
βœ…Use hierarchical indexing with global and local community summaries
βœ…Apply entity resolution and deduplication to maintain graph quality
βœ…Combine vector search with graph traversal for hybrid retrieval
βœ…Implement bounded traversal with explicit hop limits (1-3 hops)
❌Allow uncontrolled graph traversal that leads to context explosion
❌Skip entity linking validation and confidence scoring
❌Neglect graph maintenance and consistency validation
❌Create overly complex schemas that hinder query performance
❌Ignore provenance tracking for graph edges and entity sources

🚦 When to Use

Use When

  • β€’ Complex multi-hop reasoning requiring entity relationship understanding
  • β€’ Knowledge-intensive domains with rich interconnected information
  • β€’ Enterprise data with well-defined entity schemas and relationships
  • β€’ Fact-checking and verification requiring structured evidence paths
  • β€’ Large-scale knowledge bases needing hierarchical summarization

Avoid When

  • β€’ Simple factual queries adequately served by document-based RAG
  • β€’ Domains with poor entity extraction and relation modeling quality
  • β€’ Real-time applications with strict latency requirements
  • β€’ Small datasets where graph complexity exceeds retrieval benefits
  • β€’ Applications lacking well-defined entity schemas or ontologies

πŸ“Š Key Metrics

Graph Construction Quality
Precision/recall of extracted entities and relations
Community Detection Accuracy
Coherence and relevance of detected communities
Retrieval Relevance
Proportion of relevant subgraphs in query results
Multi-hop Reasoning
Accuracy of complex relationship inference
Context Completeness
Coverage of relevant graph neighborhoods
Query Response Time
End-to-end latency including graph operations

πŸ’‘ Top Use Cases

Biomedical Research: Drug-disease-gene relationship exploration with scientific literature integration
Financial Analysis: Company-industry-market relationship modeling for investment research
Legal Research: Case law relationship mapping with precedent and citation analysis
Enterprise Knowledge: Organizational relationship modeling with department and project connections
Academic Research: Citation networks and research collaboration graph analysis

References & Further Reading

Deepen your understanding with these curated resources

Contribute to this collection

Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.

Contribute

Patterns

closed

Loading...

Built by Kortexya