Agentic Design

Patterns
โšก

Concurrent Orchestration(CO)

Multiple agents work simultaneously on the same task to provide diverse perspectives and parallel processing power

Complexity: mediumMulti-Agent

๐ŸŽฏ 30-Second Overview

Pattern: Multiple agents execute the same task concurrently to provide diverse perspectives and ensemble reasoning

Why: Harnesses collective intelligence, reduces bias through diversity, increases accuracy via consensus, and accelerates decision-making

Key Insight: Parallel execution + diverse expertise + consensus mechanisms = superior decision quality and speed

โšก Quick Implementation

1Design Agents:Create diverse agents with complementary expertise
2Setup Parallel Exec:Configure concurrent processing with shared inputs
3Implement Consensus:Add voting/aggregation mechanisms for result synthesis
4Add Coordination:Implement orchestrator for resource management
5Monitor & Optimize:Track performance metrics and optimize throughput
Example: FinancialAgent โˆฅ MarketAgent โˆฅ RiskAgent โˆฅ TechAgent โ†’ Consensus โ†’ Decision

๐Ÿ“‹ Do's & Don'ts

โœ…Design agents with truly diverse perspectives and expertise
โœ…Use confidence-weighted voting for better consensus quality
โœ…Implement timeout mechanisms to prevent blocking operations
โœ…Cache results to avoid redundant processing across agents
โœ…Monitor consensus quality and agent contribution metrics
โœ…Use structured output formats for consistent aggregation
โŒCreate agents with overlapping roles and identical perspectives
โŒUse simple majority voting without considering expertise levels
โŒAllow infinite processing time without deadlock protection
โŒIgnore resource contention and memory pressure issues
โŒAccept first consensus without quality validation

๐Ÿšฆ When to Use

Use When

  • โ€ข Need diverse perspectives on complex decisions
  • โ€ข Brainstorming and creative idea generation
  • โ€ข Risk assessment requiring multiple viewpoints
  • โ€ข Ensemble reasoning for higher accuracy
  • โ€ข Parallel processing can reduce overall latency
  • โ€ข Consensus building in high-stakes scenarios

Avoid When

  • โ€ข Simple tasks with clear optimal solutions
  • โ€ข Real-time systems requiring immediate responses
  • โ€ข Limited computational resources available
  • โ€ข Tasks requiring strict sequential dependencies
  • โ€ข When agent coordination overhead exceeds benefits

๐Ÿ“Š Key Metrics

Consensus Quality
Agreement level and confidence scores
Response Diversity
Variance in agent perspectives and solutions
Processing Efficiency
Parallel speedup vs sequential execution
Decision Accuracy
Ensemble performance vs individual agents
Resource Utilization
CPU/memory usage during concurrent execution
Coordination Overhead
Time spent in synchronization and aggregation

๐Ÿ’ก Top Use Cases

Investment Decision Analysis: Financial + Market + Risk + Technology agents parallel analysis with weighted consensus
Medical Diagnosis: Clinical + Radiological + Laboratory + Specialist agents concurrent evaluation with confidence voting
Creative Content Generation: Writer + Editor + Designer + Strategist agents simultaneous brainstorming with diverse outputs
Cybersecurity Assessment: Network + Application + Compliance + Threat agents parallel security analysis with risk aggregation
Strategic Planning: Operations + Finance + Legal + Technology agents concurrent SWOT analysis with consensus building

References & Further Reading

Deepen your understanding with these curated resources

Contribute to this collection

Know a great resource? Submit a pull request to add it.

Contribute

Patterns

closed

Loading...