Patterns
πŸ“ˆ

Progressive Enhancement(PE)

Incrementally improves AI output quality based on available resources and time

Complexity: mediumPattern

Core Mechanism

Progressive Enhancement in AI delivers an immediate baseline result and continuously improves it as more compute, time, or context becomes available. It implements the anytime-algorithms principle: return the best-available output at any point, then refine. In practice, this pairs fast, low-cost pathways (streaming, speculative decoding, early exits) with background refinement loops (self-refine, re-ranking, high-accuracy passes) while preserving responsiveness and user control.

Workflow / Steps

  1. Fast Path: stream a baseline answer quickly (token streaming; lightweight model or early-exit policy).
  2. Speculate: use draft decoding or shortcuts to accelerate target model generation; verify and commit tokens.
  3. Refine Iteratively: run self-feedback or re-ranking passes to improve coherence, correctness, and style.
  4. Escalate on Demand: invoke higher-precision models/tools for hard segments or low-confidence spans.
  5. Converge or Stop Early: allow user to accept current best, or continue improving asynchronously.

Best Practices

Design for anytime returns: every partial state should be valid to show or store.
Pair a latency-optimized baseline with quality-optimized refinements; surface progress visibly.
Use confidence signals (logprobs, validators, ensembles) to decide when to refine or escalate.
Keep edits minimal between iterations; preserve user caret and scroll context in UIs.
Bound refinement loops with budgets and diminishing-returns checks to avoid quality thrash.
Make improvements cancelable; persist checkpoints and deltas for auditability.
Collect per-stage metrics (latency, tokens, acceptance rate) to tune the quality–speed curve.

When NOT to Use

  • Hard real-time tasks with fixed deadlines where refinement phases risk deadline misses.
  • Strictly deterministic compliance outputs where intermediate states could mislead users.
  • Ultra-low-cost batch jobs where a single high-quality pass is cheaper than multi-pass refinement.

Common Pitfalls

  • Unbounded refinement loops increasing cost with negligible quality gains.
  • UI jank from reflowing text without preserving cursor/scroll position.
  • Speculative decoding without verification, leading to silent correctness errors.
  • Mismatched expectations: users interpret early drafts as final answers.

Key Features

Anytime outputs with monotonic quality improvements
Token streaming with user-controllable refinement
Speculative decoding and verification to accelerate generation
Early-exit/dynamic-depth to meet latency budgets
Self-refine/self-critique loops for targeted corrections
Selective escalation to stronger models or tools

KPIs / Success Metrics

  • Time-to-first-token (TTFT) and time-to-usable-answer (TTUA).
  • Final quality metrics (task accuracy, human rating) vs. cost and latency budgets.
  • Refinement acceptance rate and cancel/stop-early rate.
  • Speculative acceptance ratio and verified-token throughput.

Token / Resource Usage

  • Cap tokens per refinement pass; summarize context between passes to bound growth.
  • Use speculative decoding to shift work to a cheaper draft model and verify on the target model.
  • Apply early-exit/dynamic-depth for latency SLAs; log per-layer exit stats.
  • Track per-stage tokens, cost, and wall-clock to tune the speed–quality frontier.

Best Use Cases

  • Interactive assistants where responsiveness is critical but quality benefits from refinement.
  • Content generation/editing with iterative polishing (summaries, drafts, code fixes).
  • Search and RAG with re-ranking and re-writing under tight latency budgets.

References & Further Reading

Patterns

closed

Loading...

Built by Kortexya